Introduction to Lean

My name is Mark Gingrass, and today, I will talk to you briefly about Lean. Not Six Sigma, just plain Lean. I think this is an essential concept that a lot of people fail to understand because the training is so drawn out, so to speak. I want to put that aside.

As someone who has been involved in process improvement initiatives for a number of years, I am often asked about the differences between Lean and Six Sigma. While both methodologies aim to improve business processes, they have distinct differences that set them apart.

Lean and Six Sigma were developed in different contexts and had different origins. Lean was developed in Japan in the 1950s, while Six Sigma originated in the United States in the 1980s. While they differ in origin, both methodologies have evolved and been adopted in various settings across industries.

One of the critical differences between Lean and Six Sigma is their focus. Lean primarily focuses on eliminating waste in processes, while Six Sigma focuses on reducing variation and improving quality. Lean is based on continuous improvement, while Six Sigma is a structured problem-solving methodology aimed at achieving measurable and sustainable improvements.

Another difference between Lean and Six Sigma is their approach to problem-solving. Lean uses various tools and techniques to identify waste and inefficiencies in processes, such as value stream mapping, 5S, and Kaizen events. On the other hand, Six Sigma uses a more structured approach to problem-solving using the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology.

The tools and techniques used in Lean and Six Sigma also differ. Lean tools are focused on improving process flow and eliminating waste, such as Just-In-Time (JIT) manufacturing, Kanban, and visual management. Six Sigma tools are focused on reducing variability and improving quality, such as statistical process control, design of experiments, and root cause analysis.

One of the most significant differences between Lean and Six Sigma is the level of cultural change that each methodology requires. Lean requires a significant cultural shift in an organization, focusing on continuous improvement and a willingness to change. Six Sigma requires a strong leadership commitment to data-driven decision-making and a focus on customer needs and expectations.

In summary, while Lean and Six Sigma are methodologies aimed at improving business processes, they have distinct differences in their focus, problem-solving approach, tools, techniques, and cultural change requirements. Ultimately, the choice of which methodology to use will depend on an organization’s specific needs and goals.

Recommended Books

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn commissions on the products listed.

  • The Lean Startup by Eric Ries
  • Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation by James P. Womack and Daniel T. Jones
  • The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer by Jeffrey K. Liker
  • 2 Second Lean: How to Grow People and Build a Fun Lean Culture by Paul A. Akers
  • Lean Six Sigma for Dummies by John A. Morgan and Martin Brenig-Jones
  • Creating a Lean Culture: Tools to Sustain Lean Conversions by David Mann
  • Value Stream Mapping: How to Visualize Work and Align Leadership for Organizational Transformation by Karen Martin and Mike Osterling
  • The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement by Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox
  • Lean Analytics: Use Data to Build a Better Startup Faster by Alistair Croll and Benjamin Yoskovitz
  • Lean UX: Designing Great Products with Agile Teams by Jeff Gothelf and Josh Seiden

Understanding Waste from the Customer’s Perspective

Lean means cutting out the waste of any process, not just cutting out the waste of the process but cutting out the waste from the customer’s perspective. To be a purist or strictly think about waste in a process from a customer’s perspective is extremely hard for most people.

From a customer’s perspective, eliminating waste means delivering products or services that meet their needs and expectations while minimizing the time, effort, and resources required. Waste, in this context, refers to any activity or process that does not add value to the customer.

For example, waiting in long lines, dealing with unresponsive customer service, or receiving damaged or defective products are all examples of waste from a customer’s perspective. These activities or processes do not add value to the customer and may even detract from their experience with the company.

Eliminating waste from a customer’s perspective involves identifying and addressing these types of issues to create a seamless and efficient experience for the customer. This can be achieved through various means, such as improving the design and functionality of products, streamlining the customer service process, or implementing lean manufacturing principles to reduce lead times and improve quality.

Ultimately, the goal of eliminating waste from a customer’s perspective is to create a positive and memorable experience for the customer, which can lead to increased loyalty, repeat business, and positive word-of-mouth recommendations.

What is Wasted Processes

In Lean, waste is commonly referred to as “Muda” and is typically classified into seven types:

  1. Overproduction: Producing more than what is required or producing it too early, resulting in excess inventory and the cost of storing, handling, and moving it.
  2. Waiting: Waiting for the next step or a required resource leads to delays and inefficiencies.
  3. Transport: Moving products, materials, or information between processes or locations unnecessarily.
  4. Overprocessing: Processing beyond the required level or producing features that are not necessary for the customer.
  5. Excess Inventory: Carrying too much inventory or raw materials, which results in increased storage, handling, and transportation costs.
  6. Unnecessary Motion: Unnecessary movements or actions by employees, machines, or materials.
  7. Defects: Rework, scrap, or returns due to quality issues, resulting in a waste of time, resources, and materials.

There are also three additional types of waste that are sometimes included in Lean methodology:

  1. Underutilization of talent: Failing to leverage the skills, knowledge, and creativity of employees, which results in underutilization of human potential.
  2. Overburdening: Assigning tasks that exceed an employee’s capability, resulting in stress, errors, and lower quality.
  3. Unused creativity: Failing to solicit and implement ideas and suggestions from employees, which can result in missed opportunities for innovation and improvement.

Organizations can reduce costs, increase efficiency, and improve customer satisfaction by identifying and eliminating these wastes.

Examples of Wasted Processes

  1. Waiting in line: Imagine you’re at a theme park and waiting in a long line to ride your favorite roller coaster. You’ve been waiting for over an hour, and you’re starting to feel frustrated and bored. The long wait time is an example of waste, as it takes time and does not add value to your experience. The theme park could address this waste by implementing a virtual queue system or improving the ride’s throughput.
  2. Overproduction: Imagine you’re a manufacturer of a popular toy. You’ve received a large order from a retailer and produced more products than needed to fulfill the order. As a result, you now have excess inventory that takes up valuable warehouse space and ties up capital. This excess inventory is an example of waste, as it does not add value to your customer and costs you money. The manufacturer could address this waste by improving demand forecasting or implementing a just-in-time inventory system.
  3. Paper-based processes: Imagine you work in a hospital and fill out a patient’s medical history on paper. You notice that the form is difficult to read, and you’re unsure if you’ve filled it out correctly. You also know that this paper form must be manually filed and stored, taking up valuable space and making it difficult to access the patient’s information later. This paper-based process is an example of waste, as it is time-consuming, error-prone, and not adding any value to the patient’s experience. The hospital could address this waste by implementing a digital medical record system, improving accuracy, accessibility, and efficiency.

The Importance of Identifying and Addressing Waste

Identifying and addressing waste is essential for organizations that want to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and provide value to their customers. Here are some key reasons why it’s essential to identify and address waste:

  1. Cost reduction: Waste can be costly to organizations in terms of time, resources, and money. Organizations can reduce costs and improve profitability by identifying and eliminating waste.
  2. Increased efficiency: Waste can slow down processes and reduce efficiency, leading to delays, errors, and inefficiencies. By addressing waste, organizations can streamline their operations and improve their productivity.
  3. Improved quality: Waste can result in defects, errors, and rework, which can negatively impact product quality and customer satisfaction. Organizations can improve the quality of their products and services by addressing waste and increasing customer loyalty and satisfaction.
  4. Sustainability: Waste can harm the environment, such as excessive use of energy, water, and raw materials. By identifying and reducing waste, organizations can reduce their environmental footprint and improve their sustainability.
  5. Competitive advantage: By addressing waste, organizations can differentiate themselves from their competitors by providing more efficient, high-quality products and services. This can lead to increased market share and revenue.

Striking a Balance: Necessary vs. Non-value-added Processes

Striking a balance between necessary and non-value-added processes is important for organizations to optimize their operations and provide the most value to their customers. Here are some key reasons why balancing these processes is important:

  1. Customer satisfaction: Non-value-added processes do not add value to the customer and may even detract from their experience. Organizations can improve customer satisfaction and loyalty by identifying and eliminating these processes.
  2. Efficiency: Non-value-added processes can be time-consuming, expensive, and unnecessary. Organizations can improve their efficiency and reduce waste by striking a balance between necessary and non-value-added processes.
  3. Cost reduction: Non-value-added processes can be costly to organizations in terms of time, resources, and money. Organizations can reduce costs and improve profitability by identifying and eliminating these processes.
  4. Quality improvement: Non-value-added processes can contribute to defects and errors, negatively impacting product quality and customer satisfaction. By balancing necessary and non-value-added processes, organizations can improve the quality of their products and services.
  5. Innovation: Striking a balance between necessary and non-value-added processes can free up resources and allow organizations to focus on innovation and improvement. By eliminating non-value-added processes, organizations can create more time and resources to invest in new technologies, products, or services.

In summary, striking a balance between necessary and non-value-added processes is important for organizations to optimize their operations and provide the most value to their customers. By doing so, organizations can improve their efficiency, reduce costs, improve quality, and invest in innovation.

Continuous Improvement and Customer Focus

Continuous process improvement is essential for organizations that want to stay competitive and provide value to their customers. Here are some key reasons why organizations should always strive for continuous process improvement:

  1. Efficiency: Continuous process improvement allows organizations to identify and eliminate waste, streamline processes, and improve efficiency. This can lead to cost savings, faster lead times, and improved productivity.
  2. Quality improvement: Continuous process improvement allows organizations to identify and address quality issues, leading to better products and services and increased customer satisfaction.
  3. Innovation: Continuous process improvement allows organizations to be more agile and responsive to changing market conditions and customer needs. This can lead to innovation and new product or service offerings.
  4. Competitive advantage: Organizations that are continuously improving their processes are more likely to stay ahead of their competitors, gain market share, and increase revenue.
  5. Employee engagement: Continuous process improvement can engage employees by giving them a sense of ownership over their work and providing opportunities for learning and development.

In summary, continuous process improvement is crucial for organizations that want to stay competitive, provide value to their customers, and engage their employees. By continuously identifying and addressing inefficiencies, improving quality, and fostering innovation, organizations can stay ahead of the curve and achieve long-term success.

Recommended Books

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn commissions on the products listed.

  • The Lean Startup by Eric Ries
  • Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation by James P. Womack and Daniel T. Jones
  • The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer by Jeffrey K. Liker
  • 2 Second Lean: How to Grow People and Build a Fun Lean Culture by Paul A. Akers
  • Lean Six Sigma for Dummies by John A. Morgan and Martin Brenig-Jones
  • Creating a Lean Culture: Tools to Sustain Lean Conversions by David Mann
  • Value Stream Mapping: How to Visualize Work and Align Leadership for Organizational Transformation by Karen Martin and Mike Osterling
  • The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement by Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox
  • Lean Analytics: Use Data to Build a Better Startup Faster by Alistair Croll and Benjamin Yoskovitz
  • Lean UX: Designing Great Products with Agile Teams by Jeff Gothelf and Josh Seiden

Similar Posts